The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who is engaged in driving a BK7 taxi.

On March 16, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on or around 20:48, and opened the roads in front of Busan City to the fire station distance from the department department on the side of the department department, and there is a center line of yellow solid lines installed, and thus, the Defendant had a duty of care to live the front bank well and use the right side of the central line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the part of the part of the victim D (Seoul, 57) driving E, which was directly engaged in the road facing the negligence of fluoring the central line, as the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, such as sexual cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral le

2. According to the records, it is recognized that the defendant changed the vehicle from a two-lane to a one-lane, and the victim's stobane and shocked in the first lane, and the defendant's stobane and shocked by the center line is not recognized.

Therefore, the instant case constitutes the main text of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and the Defendant subscribed to a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance at the time of driving of the instant case, which constitutes a case where a public prosecution cannot be instituted pursuant to Article 4(1) of the same Act.

Thus, since the public prosecution procedure of this case is invalid in violation of the provisions of law, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 2 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.