beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff, as an employee of the LAB, worked in a restaurant within the Young-dong Highway C Rest (hereinafter “instant workplace”).
B. On July 17, 2012, the Plaintiff filed a medical care benefit application with the Defendant on the ground that there was no proximate causal relation with the instant injury and disease on October 5, 2012, on the ground that: (a) the Defendant applied for medical care benefits for “the escape certificate of the 4-5 conical signboard (Evidence) and the 5-1,000 conical signboard escape certificate (hereinafter “the instant injury and disease”); (b) the Defendant rejected the instant injury and disease on the ground that there was no proximate causal relation with the business.
(hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”). [Grounds for recognition] A without dispute, A 1, B 1-1, 1-2
2. Whether the disposition is lawful;
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion was under heavy burden due to the transportation of inland water through the instant plant, etc. at the instant plant. On April 26, 2012, the Plaintiff left the country at the gas train, which caused the pain to the hospital, and was diagnosed by the disease of this case.
Therefore, since the injury and disease of this case was caused by the above so-called so-called vered work, the disposition of this case was unlawful on a different premise.
(b) Details of related data (1) and the number of workers at the place of business engaged in field surveys and sales: The number of working hours on September 8, 2010: 09: 00 to 21:00 (2 hours of business): Regular (5 days of business): 18 through 20km; 20 g, 3 through 3 months, 20 g, 200, 30 and 21: 40 to 427, 200, 200, 40 through 427, 40, 400, 400, 400-7, 40-7, 40-7, 40-7, 40-7, 40-7, 20-7, 20-7, 20-7, 20-7, 20-7, 30-7,00-7,00-7,00-7.
g. Rice 20 kg x 3, 1 to 2/day, 1 to 2, f. Workman: Most of the book work is to be carried out. The degree of risk assessment of experts: there is no degree of risk burden.