logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.08.25 2015고단2997
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 12, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months and two years and six months for robbery in the same court on October 16, 2008 and five times for punishment of violence.

1. On June 25, 2015, at the D restaurant operated by the injured party C (son, 68 years old) located in Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju on June 25, 2015, the Defendant who interfered with his/her business: (a) fluord the table by gathering fluor’s disease without any reason while drinking; (b) fluoring the table in front of the toilet, and (c) fluor’s disease in front of the toilet.

At least 20 minutes of the disturbance caused the disturbance to go out of the box.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the restaurant business of the victimized person.

2. While the Defendant damaged public goods at the above time and at the above location, arrested a police officer belonging to the Gwangju Mine Police Station, who was dispatched to the present police station, to board the E patrol vehicle, and moved to a traffic patrol box, the Defendant damaged public goods by having him/her wear the front left of the right side of the vehicle four times, by walking the front left of the vehicle, so that the amount equivalent to 390,000 won of the repair cost would be equal to the repair cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the police accused;

1. Statement made to the police officer with F;

1. On-site photographs, written statements, written statements, photographs, estimates, and written agreements;

1. References to inquiries, such as criminal history, and application of statutes;

1. Article 314 (1) and Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Where the value of the article that has been invalidated or destroyed is insignificant in the mitigation area (one month to eight months) (one month), the mitigation area (one month to eight months), the mitigation area (the scope of recommendation) of the punishment for concurrent crimes (the scope of recommendation) of Article 37 first sentence, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act on the grounds of sentencing [the scope of recommendation] of Article 38(1)2, Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes (the scope of punishment for concurrent crimes] of Article 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Crimes (the scope of recommendation] of the mitigation area (the scope of punishment for special mitigation) [the scope of punishment for the restoration of damage] of Article 38(1)2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Illegal Crimes (the special mitigation person]

arrow