beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.
If the Defendants did not pay each of the above fines, 50.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is the owner of the 3rd floor building located in Cheongju-si, the Cheongju-si, and the defendant B is the person who leases the 1st floor width of the above building from the defendant and operates the cafeteria.
Defendant
B around August 24, 2012, when it was difficult to recover lease deposit and premiums for the above 3rd floor store due to voluntary auction process with the request of the Cheongju Agricultural Cooperative for auction of the above 3rd floor building, it was ambiguous to obtain lease deposit and premiums for the above 1st floor container by leasing the above 1st floor mold to another person without notifying the progress of the above auction procedure with Defendant A.
On September 24, 2012, the Defendants met the Victim F along with the above E restaurant, and Defendant A did not inform the victim of the fact of the above auction in spite of his duty to inform the victim of the fact of the above auction when the Defendants want to enter into a lease contract with the victim. Defendant B falsely told the Defendants that “The place is good, funeral is well good, and even if they refuse to operate the match, it is only that they do not refuse to do so.”
The Defendants: (a) deceiving the victim, and Defendant A entered into a lease agreement with the victim and the victim to whom he belongs, with the lease deposit of KRW 2 million; (b) KRW 3 million; and (c) Defendant B entered into a contract with the victim to transfer all of the above E’s premium and facilities to KRW 2 million; and (b) KRW 1.8 million out of the lease deposit of KRW 2 million and the premium of KRW 2 million from the victim’s G account in the name of Defendant B; (c) transferred the remainder of the premium to KRW 2 million in cash; and (d) transferred rent of KRW 3 million to the account under the name of the Defendant A.
The Defendants, in collusion, received goods from the victim by deceiving the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ legal statement
1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;
1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;