1. The part of the second preliminary claim against the Plaintiff’s Defendants is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's defendants.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a market reconstruction and rearrangement project association established to implement a A rearrangement project (hereinafter “instant rearrangement project”) with the content of removing the old market building on the land outside Busan-gu G and 2 lots (hereinafter “instant land”) and constructing the main complex building on the ground (hereinafter “instant building”).

The Defendants owned a certain share of the instant land and a part of the old market building, and as those who bought part of the instant building, Defendant B, C, and D (hereinafter “Defendant B, etc.”) are 120 units, Defendant E are 126 units, and Defendant F are 127 units.

(However, in respect of the area, there is a dispute as follows): (b)

According to the Plaintiff’s management and disposition plan (hereinafter “instant management and disposition plan”), the size of a partner’s share in the rights is determined as the area where the larger share in the size of the share in the register of land and the register of the register of the buildings is applied (Article 4(3)), and the gratuitous share ratio is 100% of the size of the right (Article 3(2)).

The contract form between the plaintiff and the defendants also includes the same purport.

호수 등기부상 넓은 면적으로 산정한 면적(㎡)㈎ 관리처분계획 및 이전고시된 면적(㎡)㈏ 총분양면적 전용면적 총분양면적 전용면적 120 129.724 57.1126 160.8609 77.1900 126 16.5022 10.1893 33.6459 16.1453 127 19.9272 9.3916 22.5898 10.8400

다. 한편, 이 사건 관리처분계획상 120호 등에 관하여는 아래 표 ㈏란 기재와 같이 기재되어 있고, 같은 내용으로 이전고시가 이루어졌으며, 건축물대장의 내용 및 현재 사용 현황도 동일하다.

According to this, the whole section of the attached drawings, 120, 120, 126, 7, 126 and 7.

However, according to Article 4 (3) of the Management and Disposal Plan of this case, it does not exceed 120, 126, and 7.