The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (two years of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below recognizes the defendant's mistake, and the fact that there is no criminal record other than two times before and after the punishment due to drinking driving. However, it is advantageous to the fact that the defendant did not reach an agreement on the punishment of the defendant, while he stated that the defendant did not have reached an agreement on the punishment of the defendant, and that he did not have any criminal record on the punishment of the defendant, and that the defendant obtained approximately KRW 129,910,00 for about seven years against the victim of the aged (71 years old) who makes it difficult for him to neglect, and the crime is not good, and the crime of fraud is the maximum amount of the crime. The court below agreed with the victim, but according to the results of the judgment, the victim did not receive money from his prison. The victim did not appear to have reached an agreement on the punishment of the defendant, and the victim did not appear to have reached an agreement on the punishment of the defendant, and the defendant did not have any other unfavorable reasons for the defendant's purchase of the defendant's property from around 11, etc.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.