logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2020.02.20 2019고단2035
자동차관리법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. A motor vehicle registered for goods at a motor vehicle sales business place as a summary of the facts charged shall separate the front registration number plate and have it kept by the relevant motor vehicle sales business association or the head of the relevant Si/Gun/Gu, and no person shall unlawfully use the registration number plate;

Nevertheless, at around 15:20 on October 19, 2018, the Defendant operated the Doz car owned by “C” in Seowon-gu, Seowon-si, Seowon-si, Seowon-si, and used the Doz plate on November 12:26, 2018 by operating the said vehicle on the 7th national map of Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Jinsan-ri, Jinsan-ri on November 12:26, 2018.

2. In light of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the Prosecutor, it is insufficient to acknowledge that the Defendant operated the said car even with the knowledge that the benz car as indicated in the facts charged was registered for goods, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

① The Defendant consistently makes a statement to the investigative agency and the court that the said benz car was registered for goods and operated without knowledge of the fact that it is a vehicle registered for goods.

② At the time of the Defendant’s delivery of the said car from E, the car number plate was attached to the said car at the time. At the time, the ownership of the said car in the said car register was an individual (F), and it was impossible to find out that the said car was registered for the goods.

③ At the time of this court, E stated that at the time, the Defendant was not aware of the fact that the said car was registered as a product and that at the time it was not aware of the fact that the car was not registered as a product.

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act is applied.

arrow