1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The defendant alleged the claim on 2014.

1. The court's explanation concerning this case is identical to the part of the judgment of the first instance except for the supplement of judgment as set forth in the following paragraph (2). Thus, the court's explanation as to this case is accepted by Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The supplementary defendant asserts that the plaintiff's application shows that the aggravation of narrowness is merely a natural progress speed.

However, the facts recognized by the first instance court showed that even if the results of the fact inquiry about D Association president in the trial were added, the plaintiff's performance of duties or education and training had influenced the plaintiff's rapid aggravation of climatic symptoms more than a natural progress speed.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff and the defendant's appeal are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.