1. The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On February 2010, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Daegu Metropolitan City Facility Management Corporation (hereinafter “Facilities Management Corporation”) and the real estate listed in the attached table 1 owned by Daegu Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant commercial building”) on the following: (a) indication of the attached table 1, (b), (3), (4), (1), (2), (2), (3), (4), (1), (68.25 square meters in a warehouse “6” connected with each point in sequence, and (2), (3), (4), (68.25 square meters in a warehouse, and (68.25 square meters in a warehouse “6-1 square meters in a ship” (hereinafter “6-1 square meters in a ship”; (hereinafter “instant store and warehouse”); and (b) the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with each other and each of the instant stores from 20,992,000,000,000 rental deposit to 10,248,000, and (3) from 19,210.

The Defendants, as married couple, occupied the instant store and warehouse from February 10, 2012, and engaged in wholesale and retail business with the trade name “E” at the instant store.

On March 19, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Federation of Daegu Wholesale Markets related to the instant store and warehouse (hereinafter referred to as the “Commercial Federation”) under which “from March 19, 2015 to March 18, 2017 (two years) the rent was stipulated as “from March 19, 2015 to March 19, 2017” and “from March 19, 2017, the rent was annually KRW 18,980,040, and the term of the lease was from March 19, 2017 to February 18, 2019.”

From February 10, 2012, the Defendants paid rent for the store and warehouse of this case to the Facility Management Corporation and the Commercial Federation in the Plaintiff’s name or E’s trade name, etc., and the commercial federation issued a tax invoice to the store and warehouse of this case paid by the Defendants as the Plaintiff on the rent for the store and warehouse of this case.

In addition, the commercial federation is operating expenses such as management expenses for stores and warehouses of this case against the plaintiff.