logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2016.06.23 2016고단623
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【The Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Western District Court on January 24, 2014, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 25, 2014. On October 17, 2014, the same court was sentenced to imprisonment for two years and six months for fraud and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 14, 2015.

【Criminal facts of the Defendant’s crime】 From the D office located in the 10th floor of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C building around December 2007, the Defendant has a soil cooking business place for the victim E, “F in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and 27 lots long ago.”

It is necessary to confirm all the authorization and permission's work and to complete processing of the remaining permissions, and suggest that the soil and sand gathering project is defective along with the soil and sand gathering project, to show the current status of the land, and to enter into a subcontract from Hyundai Construction and GS construction, which is the amount of KRW 10 million to KRW 150 million if investment is made in the amount of KRW 100,000 to KRW 150,000,000,000,000,000 won is expected to be 30 billion if only some of the initial funds are to be made, and to make it possible to operate the project by raising funds that do not incur financial costs from the related business operators at the time of the need for additional funds.

“A false statement” was made.

However, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to obtain the authorization and permission in a normal manner because the Defendant did not engage in the above earth and sand gathering business at the time, and did not receive a subcontract from Hyundai Construction and GS construction. Even if the Defendant received the investment from the injured party, he did not have the intent or ability to proceed with the above earth and sand gathering business according to the promise.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and is the sum from the early 2008 Police Officer to September 2009, under the pretext of the gathering of soil and sand from the damaged person.

arrow