1. On January 13, 2014, the National Labor Relations Commission rendered the Central Labor Relations Commission’s order between the Plaintiffs and the Intervenor joining the Defendant, 2013.

1. Details of the decision on retrial;

A. The Intervenor Intervenor Co., Ltd (hereinafter “ Intervenor Co., Ltd”) was engaged in the business of collecting and transporting household wastes from five Eup/Myeon, including D, using 25 full-time workers in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-si. The Plaintiff A and the Plaintiff B were employed respectively in the Intervenor Co., Ltd. on December 31, 2012 and engaged in the business of collecting and transporting household wastes.

B. On August 31, 2013, the Intervenor Company notified the Plaintiffs that the term of each employment contract has expired.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant notice”). (c)

On September 5, 2013, the Ulsan Regional Joint and Several Labor Union (hereinafter “instant Trade Union”) to which the Plaintiffs and the Plaintiffs joined filed an application for remedy with the Busan Regional Labor Relations Commission by asserting that the instant notification constituted unfair dismissal and unfair labor practices.

On October 14, 2013, Busan Regional Labor Relations Commission recognized the right of fixed-term workers or the right of renewal, and accepted the request for remedy for unfair dismissal on the grounds that there is no reasonable ground for rejection of renewal, and dismissed the request for remedy for unfair labor practices on the ground that there is no evidence other than dismissal.

With respect to the part concerning unfair labor practices during the first inquiry tribunal, the plaintiffs and the labor union of this case filed a petition for review as to the unfair dismissal part during the first inquiry tribunal.

On January 13, 2014, the National Labor Relations Commission revoked the unfair dismissal part during the first inquiry court on the ground that the right to renew the labor union to the plaintiffs is not recognized, and dismissed the plaintiffs' application for remedy, and dismissed the application for review of the labor union of this case on the ground that there is no clear presentation of evidence regarding unfair labor practices.

[The grounds for recognition] / [The grounds for recognition] / [A] 1, 2, 4 and 5 evidence, Eul 1 and 8 evidence number.