logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.02.08 2016가단5025570
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly committed against the Plaintiffs each of KRW 182,293,468 and each of the said money. From August 28, 2015 to February 8, 2017.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Facts of recognition 1) Defendant C’s vehicle Ftopcar (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”)

A) On August 28, 2015, a person engaged in driving service of Defendant D was driving a road in the front of H children protection zone located in Pyeongtaek-si G, and was driving a motor vehicle in the front of H children protection zone from the front air area. Since there was a children protection zone, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle was negligent in paying attention to the safety of children walking on the road and preventing accidents in advance by taking into account the right and the right and the right of the road, and due to negligence, he/she did not find the victim J (6) who was crossing the road after getting out of the Ione Star or the 15 passenger bus for children driving on the 15 passenger, and did not find the victim J (6 years) who was driving on the road, leading to the death of his/her vehicle in the front right part of the Defendant’s vehicle and facing J on August 16, 2015.

(2) On August 28, 2015, Defendant D, who is employed by Defendant E, driving an automobile of this day or of the school bus for children with 15 passengers, and a driver of a school bus who does not have a guardian who helps children get in or get out of the school bus, must get out of the vehicle and confirm the safe getting out of the vehicle when children get in or get out of the school bus. However, at around 15:00 on August 28, 2015, when he gets out of H children protection zone for children located in Pyeongtaek-si, he was seated with the driver’s seat without getting out of the vehicle and without getting out of the vehicle to safely get out of and getting out of the vehicle.

3. Defendant E, as an operator of M&A, has caused the instant accident.

arrow