logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원 2018.06.14 2017나56981
청구이의
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court, such as accepting the judgment of the court of first instance, is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the defendant added the judgment of the court of first instance as to the argument that the defendant has repeated in the court of first instance pursuant to the main sentence of Article 42

2. The further determination of this Court

A. The gist of the Defendant’s assertion 1) Of the claims reported as rehabilitation claims against the Defendant as to whether the instant amount of promissory notes is a guaranteed obligation, the amount of KRW 500,000,000,000,000,000 shall not be deemed as KRW 2,146,337,972 (the principal, KRW 1,954,157,138, 192, 1834, and 22, 2010) issued by B for the repayment of the obligation of the Korea Federation for the payment of the obligation of the Korea Federation, and KRW 50,000,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won and KRW 2,500,000,000,000,000,000,00 won and KRW 2,505,000,00,00.

B. Determination 1) In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by comprehensively considering the Defendant’s first argument as to the Defendant’s first argument, it is reasonable to deem that the Defendant’s claim’s obligation of KRW 3.45 billion constitutes a guaranteed obligation for the instant loan obligation, and evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including serial number).

arrow