1. The Defendant’s KRW 100,000,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 6% from August 1, 2019 to September 4, 2019.

1. Fact-finding 1) On January 22, 2013, the Plaintiff engaged in the investment, distribution, etc. of motion pictures (hereinafter “instant supervision contract”) with the Defendant, a motion picture supervisor (hereinafter “first supervision contract”). Around January 22, 2013, including the above contract and the third attached contract as seen below, “instant supervision contract.”

(B) The first supervision contract (Evidence B 2) was concluded, and the main contents of the first supervision contract (Evidence B) are as follows (‘A’ refers to the Plaintiff, and ‘B’ refers to the Defendant:

The purpose of this contract is to clarify the rights and obligations of “A” and “B” in performing the supervisory duties of “B” as defined in Article 3 (hereinafter referred to as “the motion picture for this case”) through investment. This contract is to enter into force for three years from the date of conclusion of the contract, and the distribution and investment of the motion picture for this case within the contract period shall be determined by the time of the determination of “B” and “B” after the lapse of three years. The time of this contract shall be the date of its extension or termination after consultation with “A” and “B” (subject to the contract).

1. “A” and “B” are the main cases.