logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.04.30 2015고단521
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] The defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Goyang Branch of the Jung-gu District Court on May 19, 2008. On September 3, 2010, the defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Gwangju District Court on September 3, 2010, and was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act on at least two occasions.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around 15:00 on January 18, 2015, the Defendant: (a) driven a C-do motor vehicle at a distance of about 500 meters from the front side of the chemical tower located on the Sejong-si in the city of Jeonnam-si, under the influence of alcohol by 0.110%; and (b) from the front side of the chemical tower located on the ground of Jeonnam-si to the road of the shooting distance at the entrance of the train village located on the same side around that time.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving of the franchise.

On January 18, 2015, the Defendant was under the influence of 0.110% of blood alcohol concentration at a 0.15:00%, and was driving the said car at a fluent speed, on the ground that it was dangerous for the Defendant to stop beyond the stop line while waiting for the signal to enter the said intersection from the ethic village to the ethic village at the ethic city at the ethic city.

In such cases, the driver has a duty of care to safely drive the steering direction and the left and right of the driving, accurately manipulates the steering gear, etc. and safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and did not see the rear, and by negligence left behind the Defendant’s driver’s car, received the front part of the Do driving car, waiting for the signal at the rear of the Defendant’s driver’s car, as the part behind the Defendant’s driver’s car.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence on duty requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the victim F (V, 43 years of age) who was accompanied by the said D Driving Vehicle.

arrow