A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 10, 2013, at the office of the first floor of the D community service center located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on May 10, 2013, the Defendant: (a) under the influence of alcohol, expressed to the public official E in charge of welfare of the disabled and the public official F in charge of social welfare without any reason, the Defendant: (b) taken the image of the public official in charge of welfare of the disabled; and (c) taken the name of the above community service center where the name is unknown.

Accordingly, the Defendant was scamed and shacked to the head of the Dong, "I am we see? I am we see to the head of the Dong," and the above F and the public interest service personnel G, who observed this, prevented the Defendant, and the Defendant scamed once a week the number of back of the above G.

In accordance with the above F and G, the Defendant moved out of the above community service center, and re-entered the above G, and brought the above G with a bath, such as “Woo Sheb wres wres wres wres wres wres wres wres wres wres wres wres wres wres wres on the floor, and broken down the name tag of the female, which is a public object on the above book, on the floor.

The defendant continued to have had a computer monitor on the above book, and the above F has prevented it, and the F face part was 1 time as the hand floor.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning civil petition handling affairs in the above E, F, and G community service center, and damaged goods used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of the E, F, and G;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph damaged objects and report on investigation (on-site photographing motion pictures);

1. Relevant Article 141(1) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on probation and order to attend the course lies in the assertion that the defendant was in a state of mental disability under the influence of alcohol at the time of the instant crime.