logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2021.02.05 2020가합73313
주주권확인
Text

Of common shares 200,000 common shares issued by F Co., Ltd., 15,000 shares in the shareholder list and Defendant C’s name.

Reasons

1. Fact-finding;

A. The F Co., Ltd. F (hereinafter “F”) is a company for the purpose of construction business of steel products. The total number of outstanding stocks up to now is 200,000 common share (10,000 won per share) and its representative director is the plaintiff.

B. The F’s list of shareholders as of December 31, 2019 is as follows:

A HH B CD E

C. From July 2007 to December 2007, the Defendants: (a) each of the common shares listed in the shareholders list as described in paragraph (b) (15,000 shares in the name of Defendant B, 15,000 shares in Defendant C, 20,000 shares in Defendant D’s name, and 50,000 shares in Defendant E; (b) each of the above certificates was issued by a notary public upon obtaining a notarized consent from law firm I on January 4, 2008 to the Plaintiff.

【Grounds for Recognition】 Each entry in the evidence (including some number) Nos. 1 through 6, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts established above, the Plaintiff appears to have been entrusted with each of the Defendants, and it is insufficient to reverse the recognition of the above facts only with the evidence Nos. 1 and 2.

The fact that a duplicate of the instant complaint to the purport of seeking confirmation of shareholders' rights under the premise of termination of the nominal trust agreement on the instant shares is clear in the record that it was served on the Defendants. As such, each of the nominal trust agreements between the Plaintiff and the Defendants was terminated at that time, and the shareholders' rights of the instant shares were returned to the Plaintiff. As long as the Defendants asserted this, the benefit

Therefore, the plaintiff's argument on the ground of claim of this case is with merit.

3. Therefore, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants of this case against the defendants is accepted in its reasoning, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow