beta
Text
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendants shall be revoked, and it shall be stated in the attached Form 2 list corresponding to the revoked part.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Defendants concluded a sales contract (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) with the Plaintiffs listed in the separate sheet No. 2 (hereinafter “Plaintiff D, etc.”) from November 2010 to December 2012, as the selling company of Yeonsu-gu Incheon KTB B block C apartment (hereinafter “instant apartment”). The sales contract of this case was conducted by the Defendant, a sales agency, by setting the sales price in the amount indicated in the separate sheet No. 3 “supply Price” as stated in the separate sheet No. 3 (hereinafter “instant sales contract”). The sales contract of this case was conducted by the Defendant, a sales agent of the sales agency (hereinafter “original mining”).
B. Around March 2011, the Defendants promised to offer discount benefits to Plaintiff D, etc. who purchased the above special supply household while selling the apartment of this case at a discount of supply household, and then exclusively stored a special agreement stating the contents of the above discount benefits and confidentiality on the ground of the confidentiality of the existing buyers, etc. (hereinafter “instant special agreement”).
However, the Defendants granted the same discount benefits to the previous buyers after the sale of the Plaintiff D, etc. was made.
C. Meanwhile, from January 2013, after the sale of the instant apartment complex to Plaintiff D, etc., the Defendants implemented the “frithic book” with the content that “if the Defendants paid 20% of the total selling price and received a loan under the name of the buyer, and paid 60% of the intermediate payment, interest on the said loan for two years, ownership transfer registration expenses, acquisition tax on behalf of the Defendants shall be paid, deferred for two years, and the remainder payment shall be deferred for two years, and if several buyers withdraw their purchase intent, the total amount already paid shall be refunded.” As a result, the performance of the “frithic book” in 2013 (615 households) was significantly increased compared to the sales performance in 2012 (26 households).
In addition, the defendants are in the apartment of this case.