The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are extenuating circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant suffered from the whistle-pathn expenses to be born and physically disabled, and that the Defendant seems to have lived without any relatively big problem during the past ten years, the Defendant stolen the victim's wallets, etc., which he became aware of in the rest area for the homeless, and the victim was 1.2 million won of the theft amount, and the victim was sculed as entertainment expenses, and the agreement or the payment of damage was not made at all until the trial, and other various circumstances, which are the conditions for the sentencing of the instant case, such as the Defendant's age, character, character and environment, are considered as excessive punishment imposed by the lower court.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.