A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a third party car.

On April 1, 2018, while the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol by 0.128% during blood transfusion, the Defendant driven the said car from the fluence road located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Dongdaemun-gu, to approximately 3km away from the fluence road located in Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, and continued to drive the said car on the front of Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu, with approximately 3km meters away from the fluence of the two-lanes of the said letter at a non-speed speed.

At the time, the time is a new wall, so it is not good to view the view, and there was a road on which vehicles can drive only one lane by setting a street parking on the two-lanes. In such a case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering and steering gear and accurately operating the steering and steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, has been parked on the right-hand side of the proceeding direction by negligence when he neglected his duty of care and neglected his duty of care on the front side.

E The left part of the truck is turned into the front part of the passenger vehicle driven by the Defendant, and the victim F owned by the victim F, who is parked in the same direction, and the behind part of the passenger vehicle in the victim H owned by the victim F, and the behind part of the victim H owned by the victim H, and the above low-priced passenger vehicle was pushed back in the future, and the victim J 520 vehicle was followed by the behind part of the passenger vehicle in the victimJ.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, failed to immediately stop a vehicle and abscond without taking necessary measures, such as removal of traffic risks and obstacles, so that the amount equivalent to KRW 1,637,598 is equivalent to the above 5,345,08 of the repair cost, and the above MF520 of the repair cost is equal to KRW 1,796,319.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. L and J, respectively.