A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 28, 2016, the Defendant: (a) 21:32, around 21:32, around 2016, 112 reported that the Defendant was driving ahead of the Defendant, including the Defendant, in front of the Kasan City B; (b) was under the control of the police box E, and the police box F, which called the Defendant, carried the chest of the said police officer by hand; and (c) was under the control of the said police officer by hand, and (d) was tightly flaped with the dub of the said victims.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the notification and the duties to maintain on-site order of the police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Application of CCTV Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act or more;