Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 21:00 to 22:00 on April 27, 2017, the Defendant, on the ground that the victim D (here, 38 years of age) was about her own at the cafeteria B “C” restaurant in Chungcheongnam-gun, Geumsan-gun, Geumsan-gun, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as the inner section, the left-hand gate, the left-hand gate, and the left-hand gate, by taking several steps on the part of the victim who was over her course, and taking several steps on the part of the victim who was over her head, thereby taking approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D, E, F, and G;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each police statement made to D, E, and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report (Submission of a medical certificate for injury);

1. Relevant laws concerning criminal facts, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act that choose a penalty, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The gist of the allegation is that the Defendant was at the center of the victim, among the dispute with E at the site, and only was used for the victim, and the Defendant did not take the course of the victim’s dispatch and hair along with the facts charged.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the judgment, the fact that the defendant inflicted an injury on the victim by exercising the force of force as stated in the facts constituting the crime can be acknowledged.

(1) The victim specifically stated the details of the Defendant’s assault, the core point of the crime from an investigative agency to this court.

② At the time, E, who had drinking with the victim, testified to the same effect as the victim.

The F, which was at the site of the instant case, did not seem to have abused the victim. However, it was concluded that the Defendant did not have abused the victim. However, the F, after the instant case, did not have to file a complaint with the victim.

The cosmetic operated by the defendant.