A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 18, 2014, 22:15, the Defendant: (a) expressed that he was 55 marb, a Cheongju-si, a Cheongju-si, a Cheongju-si, a Cheongju-si, a Cheongju-si, a 112-report, and sought to witness F who was used in the street by the Defendant for violence by E, and without any reason, during the influence of alcohol, instructed D to see why he was able to see and assault F; (b) he was able to see why he was able to see, “F. 4 times to f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties of police officers on crime prevention.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol to D and F

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [decision of the type of punishment], the first category [decision of the recommended area] of the obstruction of performance of official duties, the basic area of the obstruction of official duties [the scope of sentence of recommendation] [the scope of imprisonment from June to April 1], the crime of this case is heavier in light of the circumstances of the crime, its contents, and the circumstances before and after

However, the fact that the defendant's mistake is recognized, there is no criminal record punished for obstruction of performance of official duties, and the age, character, character, occupation, family relationship of the defendant.