Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a marina freight vehicle B.

On November 27, 2014, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle on November 27, 2014, and led to the progress of the D Factory Draft, which is located in C at the time of Jinjin.

Since there was a lot of place for people to pass through the factory, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the steering gear and brakes.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not discover the victim E (the age of 50) due to the negligence of neglecting this and did not discover the victim E (the age of 50) and got the victim back to the bottom of the cargo loaded by the defendant, and had the victim go beyond the floor, and had the victim go back with the back wheels of the cargo loaded by the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the death of the victim by occupational negligence, i.e., multiple organ damage from the seat.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Evidence and photographs concerning the accident site and the case;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a written autopsy;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and selection of

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] General Traffic Accidents of Type 2 (Special Mitigation) [Special Mitigation in April to October] [including efforts to recover from damage] / [Pronouncement Decision] that caused the death of the victim by negligence that has not been paid due attention to whether or not a defendant has passed a vehicle behind the factory, is disadvantageous to the defendant. The fact that the defendant first agreed with the bereaved family members of the victim, that the defendant was driven and driven by the defendant, that the motor vehicle operated by the defendant is covered by comprehensive insurance, and that the victim is driving the motor vehicle.