1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as follows, and thus, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

The part written in the end shall be from 5th to 5th 18th 5th 18. The part "......" is as follows.

A person shall be appointed.

C. First, we judge the second argument of the plaintiff and the defendant.

1 People's right to know, in particular, the right to access information held and managed by public institutions, is recognized in relation to the freedom of expression, which is a fundamental right under the Constitution of the Republic of Korea, and the content of such right includes the so-called general right to information disclosure that anyone can request

The Information Disclosure Act enacted for the purpose of guaranteeing citizens' right to know and securing citizens' participation in state affairs and transparency in the operation of state affairs provides that information held and managed by public institutions should be disclosed in accordance with the provisions of this Act. Article 5(1) provides that all citizens shall have the right to request disclosure of information, and Article 6 provides for the contents of the right to request disclosure of information and the procedure for exercising the right to request disclosure of general information, such as the provisions on the duties of public institutions that should enforce this Act and amend relevant Acts and subordinate statutes so that people's right to request

Considering the meaning and nature of the general right to request information disclosure, the content and legislative purpose of the Information Disclosure Act, and the fact that the Information Disclosure Act does not impose any limitation on the purpose of use of or reasons for accessing the information in relation to the exercise of the right to request information disclosure, a citizen’s claim for information disclosure does not constitute information subject to non-disclosure as stipulated in