1. The Plaintiff:

A. As regards Defendant B’s KRW 230,000,000 and its KRW 200,000 among them, Defendant B shall be from August 27, 2013 to 30,000.

1. As the Defendants agreed with the Defendants to withdraw the instant lawsuit on August 23, 2013, the Defendants asserted that the instant lawsuit was unlawful against the agreement to withdraw the lawsuit.

According to the evidence evidence No. 1, 2013, the Plaintiff and Defendant B set the principal amount of Defendant B’s obligation (including obligation under Defendant C) to the Plaintiff on August 23, 2013 as KRW 1,00,000,000 per annum, and KRW 5,000,000 among them, shall be repaid until August 31, 2014, and the remainder of KRW 500,000,000 shall be paid until August 31, 2015, and ② Defendant B shall have agreed on the establishment of a new mortgage on each of the above land and buildings as joint collateral to the Plaintiff, KRW 1,00,000,000, KRW 500,000, KRW 1,000, KRW 500,000, KRW 500, and KRW 300,000, KRW 30,000, and KRW 3,00,000, respectively, respectively.

However, barring any special circumstance, if an agreement between the parties to withdraw a lawsuit has been reached, the lawsuit shall be dismissed on the ground that there is no legal interest to continue the lawsuit, but the legal interest to continue the lawsuit shall not be denied unless the fulfillment of the condition is recognized (see Supreme Court Decision 2013Da19571, Jul. 12, 2013). The agreement in this case is as seen earlier (2) and (3). The fact that the agreement in this case is subject to the contents of the above, and (3) is as seen earlier, and the power of attorney and certificate of personal seal prepared by G, H, I, and J to Defendant B.