logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2019.04.29 2019고단409
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 2,00,000 won, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 3,000,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From the end of February 2018 to July 5, 2018, Defendant A leased an officetel Est, F, G, H, I, I, J, and Busan-gu Office of the Busan-gu Office of the Republic of Korea, and then advertised the said office with the trade name of “O” to “N”, and advertised the said office in the name of “O”. From the end of February 2018 to the end of July 5, 2018, Defendant A engaged in the act of arranging sexual traffic by having P, Q, R, and S, etc., a woman of sexual traffic, who is a woman of sexual traffic, acquire one hundred thousand won at the cost of sexual traffic from the female male customers who visited the place, and had them do the act of arranging sexual intercourse, such as arranging sexual traffic, by making the female women of sexual traffic, who are women of sexual traffic, take part in the male sexual organ of sexual traffic, and by taking into account the situation.

2. around May 2018, Defendants B and C were employed by A as the office manager of the said commercial sex acts business establishment run by A, and thereafter, from July 5, 2018 to July 5, 2018, upon being aware of the fact that the said commercial sex acts are arranging commercial sex acts as described in the foregoing paragraph 1., they received KRW 1,500,000 per month from each of the said commercial sex acts establishments. According to A’s instructions, the said Defendants provided an officetel as described in the foregoing paragraph 1., in which customers are waiting for commercial sex acts, and aided and abetting the said A by facilitating their commercial sex acts while taking charge of cleaning business establishments.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Each legal statement of the defendant B and C

1. Each police suspect examination protocol of P, Q, R, S, T, or U;

1. Lease contract or each employer agreement;

1. Decision on preservation for forfeiture at Busan District Court 2018 Seocho131;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (limited to field photographs and dialogues);

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Imprisonment with prison labor, covering Article 19(2)1 and Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic

B. Defendant B and C: Selection of fines, including Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and Article 32(1) of the Criminal Act

2. Statutory mitigation;

arrow