Text
The imprisonment with prison labor for the accused shall be determined by one year and two months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On July 28, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to transfer of juvenile protection cases by special larceny, etc. at the Daejeon District Prosecutors' Office in the Daejeon District Prosecutors' Office on January 5, 201, to transfer juvenile protection cases by the same Public Prosecutors' Office on January 5, 2012, to transfer juvenile protection cases by the same Public Prosecutors' Office in the same Public Prosecutors' Office on February 16, 2012, to transfer juvenile protection cases by the same crime in the same Public Prosecutors' Office on March 20, 2013, and to transfer juvenile protection cases by the same public Prosecutors' Office in the same Public Prosecutors' Office on March 20, 201, and on June 23, 2015, the Defendant completed the execution of the sentence by having been sentenced to imprisonment of one year and six months for the same crime in the Incheon Prison Branch on June 15,
At around 02:00 on July 9, 2016, the Defendant came to a Da apartment-care center in Yong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul, and opened a correction device by putting the corrected windows in his hand, and carried out one Nowon-gu, the market price of the victim’s possession in the office of the victim E. In addition, from the above date to August 4, 2016, the Defendant stolen or attempted property worth KRW 4,628,000, total market price from the day to August 4, 2016, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each written statement of F, E (2), G, H, I (2), J, K (2), L, M, N (3),O, P (4), Q, R, S (2), T and U;
1. All on-site photographs, on-site inspection photographs, CCTV images, on-site photographs, and CCTV photographs;
1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;
1. Investigation report (tele call of a witness);
1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal history records, inquiry reports, inquiry reports, the current status of confinement/taking by individuals, and investigation reports (pre-offender of repeated crimes and attachment of judgment);
1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to which dampness is recognized in light of the records of each crime, the frequency of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the repeated crimes of the same kind in the judgment;
1. Articles 332, 331(1), 330, and 342 of the Criminal Act inclusive of the pertinent Articles of law and the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;
1. The reason for sentencing Article 35 of the Criminal Act is that of repeated crimes.