A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) by the Defendant is a person engaging in driving a passenger car with B low-speed car;

On May 23, 2018, the Defendant driven the above car at around 01:30, and driven it to the Seoul bank, as the U.S., which is in the Hanam-si extension road, led to the movement from Gwangju bank to the Seoul bank.

At the time, the two-lanes of the two-lanes in which the center is installed, have a duty of care to thoroughly see the front hour in the case of a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle, and to protect the lanes and safely drive the motor vehicle in accordance with the direction of the road, thereby preventing accidents.

Nevertheless, the Defendant met the front part of the victim C(the 42-year-old driver)'s freight vehicle, which was living in Gwangju as the main part of the road, due to the negligence of the Defendant's collisioning the central line of the drunk Sea and driving the road under the influence of the U.S. and driving the road under the influence of the U.S. as the main part above the left side of the said vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as a ductal and lavadity in need of approximately 14 weeks of treatment, due to the above occupational negligence.

2. Around 03:09 on May 23, 2018, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluoring to take a drinking level), despite the fact that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol, such as having caused a traffic accident as described in paragraph (1), while driving in an emergency room of the E Hospital located in Gangdong-gu Seoul, while the Defendant was driving in the influence of alcohol, and having snicked on the inside of the Defendant, and smelled on the inside of the Defendant, he was demanded by the police officer, a police officer belonging to the F of the Hennam Police Station, to take a drinking measuring instrument three times in total, to comply with the drinking level measurement without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of H and C;

1. A medical certificate;

1. A traffic accident report (1), a traffic accident report (2), and a driver;