logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.11.26 2015고단1334
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A, who operates a sexual traffic business establishment with the trade name “E” located in B in the front city of Jeonju, committed the following crimes despite the fact that anyone was prohibited from mediating sexual traffic.

A. On October 6, 2014, the Defendant employed F (n, 28 years of age) in the above E as an employee on October 6, 2014, and had such female receive 80,000 won from a male guest who wants to engage in sexual traffic and have him/her engage in sexual traffic at the above place, and received 50,000 won from such female as a brokerage expense for sexual traffic.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic.

B. On June 15, 2015, the Defendant employed G (nive and 26 years of age) from the above E as an employee on June 15, 2015, and had such female engage in sexual traffic at the said place after receiving KRW 80,000 from a male guest who wants to engage in sexual traffic, and received KRW 500,000 from such female as a brokerage fee for sexual traffic every month.

On June 18, 2015, the Defendant received a request from the customer H to withdraw sexual traffic, and accepted it, and then introduced the said G to receive KRW 80,000 as the price for sexual traffic and to have the said H conduct of sexual intercourse.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic.

2. No defendant B shall provide a building or engage in arranging sexual traffic, knowing that he/she is provided with sexual traffic;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as the owner of the building of the above EM business place, knew of the fact that the above A is operating a sexual traffic business place, he would be paid KRW 1 million per month from July 2014 to October 28 of the same year, and leased the above E building from around 3 months.

Accordingly, the defendant provided a building owned by the defendant to a sexual traffic place, knowing that he was to be used as a sexual traffic place.

Summary of Evidence

1...

arrow