logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.02.03 2014고단9573
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,00,000,00,00 for four months of imprisonment for A.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who intends to engage in business of exchanging or arranging exchange or repurchase tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products shall do so;

Nevertheless, on November 6, 2013, the Defendant opened the PC room business in the Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City H on November 6, 2013, attracting many customers, increasing profits, and one-person AI et al. recruited points obtained using game products to exchange them in cash with customers who find the above game room.

According to the above public offering from November 6, 2013 to April 3, 2014, the Defendant: (a) opened an online game “Tang International War 2” in a computer to provide customers with an online game for use; (b) from around 6, 2013 to around 3, 2014, the Defendant: (c) opened a 40-day average point acquired by customers from the said “I”; (d) opened a PC with the contents that he/she would either get or lose the points determined by the PC; and (e) transferred the amount equivalent to the amount of money calculated by deducting 10% from the points acquired by customers to the account of cash or customers.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with AI, was involved in exchanging tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

2. Defendant B, while serving as an employee in the PC room from around December 2013 to April 3, 2014, with knowledge of the fact that the said A, AI, etc. performed an act of exchange, as described in the foregoing paragraph 1., the Defendant sent the account number, account number, and amount of money to be received from customers who wish to exchange to assist the said act, to the mobile phone of the said A, and assisted them.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Examination protocol of Defendant A by the prosecution;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of Defendant B concerning the police officer

1. Seizure records;

1. A written statement;

1. The investigation report;

arrow