Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff) has failed to pay the following amount.

1. The reasoning for this part of the underlying facts is that of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance (from No. 10 to the last day of the 2th page 10 to No. 3), in addition to the parts written by the court below, the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance (the second page 10 to the last day

The part to be used in the judgment of the court of first instance - The following "labor contracts" (hereinafter referred to as "work contracts of this case") shall be amended to "work contracts of this case (hereinafter referred to as "work contracts of this case") as follows:

The following shall be added to the third instance judgment of the first instance following the third instance judgment:

E. Meanwhile, from July 2015 to September 2015, the Defendant received benefits at a fixed rate. From October 2015 to retirement, the Defendant received benefits calculated at the rate of sales from October 2015 to the time of retirement. Among them, he/she worked for the “high class team” or “high class two team” with other instructors of the Plaintiff’s private teaching institute as well as for the period from October 2015 to December 2016. From January 2017 to May 2017, the Defendant opened a short class against the Defendant alone and continued lectures.

[....]

2. The reasoning for this Court’s judgment on this part is that the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance (from No. 4th to the last day of the 7th page) is identical to the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance (from No. 2 through No. 7th page), and thus, this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part written by the court of first instance - The term "work contract" of the fourth side of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be defined as "work contract or work contract".

- Each "work contract of this case" of the sixth and eightth of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be subject to each "work contract of this case".

- No. 6 of the judgment of the first instance court, and each “work contract” of the six conducts below shall be written with each “work contract”.

In addition, "The plaintiff did not have working hours beyond his/her lecture hours."