The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In the misapprehension of the legal principle, the Defendant merely driven the road on which the victim returned, and did not have any circumstance when the victim resisted.

B. The sentence sentenced by the lower court (one million won in penalty) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In light of the records, a thorough examination of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below as to the assertion of misunderstanding of facts or misapprehension of legal principles, the court below's determination of guilty of this part of the facts charged is justified, and the judgment of the court below is not erroneous in the misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles as

Therefore, this part of the defendant's argument is without merit.

B. In full view of the records of this case and all of the sentencing conditions shown in the pleadings, including the fact that the crime of this case was committed by assaulting a victim on driving, which is highly likely to commit the crime, and the defendant did not recover from damage, the court below's sentence sentenced by the court below is judged appropriate, and it does not seem unfair because it is too unreasonable, so there is no reason for the defendant's wrongful assertion of sentencing.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.