1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

가. 원고는 2011. 10. 10. B 주식회사(이하 이 사건 회사라 한다)에 입사하여 자동차부품 시험평가 업무를 수행하였는데 2013. 7. 9. 19:00경 성능실험실에서 개발품 실험평가를 하기 위하여 시험장비에 볼트류를 체결하고 장착하는 도중 목을 삐끗하여 ‘경추 제5-6번간 추간판탈출증 및 경추부 염좌 및 긴장’(이하 이 사건 상병이라 한다) 진단을 받게 되었다고 주장하면서 2014. 6. 20. 피고에게 요양신청을 하였다.

B. On September 17, 2014, the Defendant rendered the instant disposition not to grant medical care to the Plaintiff on the ground that the number of signboards escape from a warning board No. 5-6 on September 17, 2014 was not clearly identified, and the Plaintiff’s work period is not also the Plaintiff’s work period, and the work content is not particularly an excessive burden, and it does not seem to have a proximate causal relationship between the upper branch and the work of this case.

[Reasons for Recognition] Gap evidence No. 2-1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. Until July 9, 2013, the Plaintiff asserted that there was no fact that the Plaintiff was an injury or disease in the instant case, and there was no opinion of e.g., RoI’s reading results three times thereafter.

The Plaintiff, while working 12 hours a day in the instant company, operated 19 devices for the test and evaluation of automobile parts, performed 20 or more parts per day while testing more than 20 parts per day, and entered into and dismantleing 4 hours per day, which could have been able to do so without a dump for 4 hours. The Plaintiff’s work at 50% in order to prevent cumping the power of 59 to 150 Kg when he or she sets mar M 10, 12, M16, 18 mar. In this case, the Plaintiff’s work at 45 degrees or more was a large and regular work.

In addition, the Plaintiff is the instant company.