1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) Of the three floors of the buildings listed in the separate sheet, each point of the attached sheet No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 1.

1. Basic facts

가. 원고는 2015. 2. 24. 피고에게 원고 소유의 별지 목록 기재 건물 3층 중 별지 도면 표시 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 1의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 ㈎부분 점포 99㎡(이하 ‘이 사건 점포’라 한다)를 임대차보증금 1,000만 원, 월 차임 50만 원(매월 4일에 선불로 지불), 임대차기간 2015. 4. 4.부터 2017. 4. 3.까지로 정하여 임대하였다

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). B.

피고는 2015. 4. 10.경부터 쑥뜸업소를 운영하고자 인테리어, 환풍기, 수도 공사 및 간판 설치공사 등을 시행하는 방법으로 이 사건 점포를 점유하였다.

C. However, the Defendant did not pay the monthly rent after May 2015.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff terminated the instant lease contract with the Defendant by serving the duplicate of the complaint of this case.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts found above, since the lease contract of this case was terminated on February 17, 2016, it is clear that the duplicate of the complaint of this case containing the expression of intent to terminate the contract of this case was served on the Defendant, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the store of this case to the Plaintiff, and to return unjust enrichment of the amount equivalent to the rent of KRW 4 million in arrears calculated by the ratio of KRW 500,000 per month from May 4, 2015 to January 3, 2016, beginning from May 4, 2015 to January 3, 2016, and from January 4, 2016 to the completion date of delivery of the store of this case.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim shall be accepted on the grounds of its reasoning, and it is so decided as per Disposition.