The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment that the Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes, and there are circumstances to consider the circumstances leading to the instant crimes.

However, the crime of this case is that the defendant threatened the victim by the so-called retaliation driving, and the risk of such crime is so severe that its nature is not less severe, and the victim wants to punish the defendant, and there is no change in circumstances that are the conditions of sentencing in the trial compared with the original judgment.

In full view of all the circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, circumstances after the crime, circumstances after the crime, and sentencing of similar cases, including these circumstances, the lower court’s punishment is only within the scope of reasonable discretion and is not deemed unfair because it is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.