logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.06.13 2019고단2063
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 07:00 on February 24, 2019, the Defendant: (a) confirmed the on-site situation and asked the Defendant personal information of the police officer affiliated with the Daegu Suwon Police Station C District, who called up after receiving a report from 112 on the content that “the son will remain at his house” in the restaurant located in Daegu Suwon-gu B; (b) confirmed the on-site condition of the police officer affiliated with the Daegu Suwon Police Station C District, and asked the Defendant of his personal information, and (c) took a bath, such as “I am to her opening, but I am to her seat, I am to her body,” and (d) expressed five times on the face of the said D.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Work site in the C District;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (in case of a restaurant staff E phone statement), an investigation report (in case of the video recording of the CCTV at the site, CDs, and a photograph of the

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act Article 334(1) of the Provisional Payment Order is the confession and reflect of the defendant, the degree of obstruction of the performance of official duties is not serious, the primary offender is the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and consequence of the crime, and other circumstances shown in the arguments of this case, including the circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered by the order.

arrow