1. B. The receiver of the rehabilitation debtor B, who is the taking over of the lawsuit against the defendant B.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is the party. 1) The plaintiff is the 11-dong 966 apartment units on the land of Yeongdeungpo-gu, Young-gu E (hereinafter "the apartment unit of this case").

In order to manage, Defendant B is an autonomous management body composed of its occupants. (2) Defendant C is a project proprietor who constructed and sold the instant apartment, and Defendant Cho film is a company whose name and seal is indicated in the project proprietor’s column of the application for approval of the inspection of the use of the instant apartment, and Defendant Cho film is a guarantee company which entered into a warranty contract with Defendant B on the instant apartment as follows.

B. 1) The Defendant B entered into a contract for the warranty of defects with the Defendant Construction Mutual Aid Association for the instant apartment as the guarantee creditor with respect to each contract for the warranty of defects as described below (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “each guarantee contract of this case”).

The guarantee creditor of each of the instant contracts was changed to the Plaintiff. After that, the guarantee creditor of each of the instant contracts was changed to the guarantee period of 1F columns and bearing walls from February 27, 2006 to February 26, 2016 (10 years) 622,395,572 G, floor, roof 27 February 27, 2006 to February 26, 2011 to February 26, 2006 to 62,395.72 HH and foundation, etc. (5 years) which did not perform the construction works within the warranty period of 206 to 26 February 26, 2009 (3 years), and Defendant J. 26, 207 to 26.28, 206 to 26.6, 206 to 26.27, 206 to 26.6, etc. (3 years from February 26, 2009).

3. On the other hand, Defendant B completed the instant apartment, and around February 28, 2006, from the acceptance market as to the instant apartment.