1. It is confirmed that the Plaintiff’s damage liability stated in the separate sheet against the Defendant does not exist.

2...

1. Basic facts

A. On September 2014, the Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “Supplementary Intervenor”) purchased an outdoor gas storage machine (a model name TH-3200, hereinafter referred to as the “instant heating machine”) manufactured by the Plaintiff.

B. On November 24, 2014, the Intervenor leased and used the unit No. 1 of the D Fishing Place D (hereinafter “instant fishing place”) located in C, the Defendant’s operation from the Defendant, for two and three days. At that place, the Intervenor connected to the instant heating apparatus with a portable butane gas container. On November 26, 2014, the incident occurred where the portable butane gas container connected to the instant heating apparatus was dried and the windows, windows, glass, and walls panel were destroyed (hereinafter “instant accident”).

C. On November 27, 2014, the Korea Gas Safety Corporation concluded that the Plaintiff and the Defendant requested the Korea Gas Safety Corporation to appraise the causes of the instant accident. The Korea Gas Safety Corporation concluded that “(i) is presumed to be melting and melting the instant heating apparatus under the condition of melting and melting it, but the degree of melting and melting it is so serious that the cause of the fire occurred in the instant heating apparatus, and (ii) as to the instant heating apparatus connected to the instant heating apparatus, it appears that the level of melting and melting it is high due to the temperature increase caused by fire.”

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, 2, and 6, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion was not revealed that the cause of the instant accident occurred due to various causes, such as negligence in the use of the Intervenor’s product, other external factors, etc., and thus, it cannot be deemed that the accident occurred due to the manufacturing defect of the heating apparatus. The instant accident was caused by the defects of the heating apparatus.