Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000 and by a fine of KRW 300,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 25, 2015, Defendant A, at the F Authorized Broker Office located in Ma on April 17:40, 2015, was injured by the victim B (n, 42 years old) who was in a business relationship with the Lifelong Education Center, and the victim, who was willing to incur money during the dispute regarding the distribution of rent premium, the Defendant was spawned, and the victim was spawned, and the victim’s chest was spawnd, so that the victim’s chest would need to be treated for about three weeks by pushing the victim’s chest.

2. Defendant B, at the same time and place as above 1, assaulted the shoulder and chest of the victim A (the 53-year old age), at the same time and place as above 1.

Summary of Evidence

[Case 1]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect B of the police;

1. A written diagnosis of injury (the facts constituting the crime of paragraph (2) of the judgment);

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police suspect interrogation protocol to A;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; Selection of fines

B. Defendant B: Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act; Selection of fines

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The Defendants who bear the costs of lawsuit: Defendant B and his defense counsel’s assertion on the Defendant B and the defense counsel’s assertion of Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act asserted that the illegality of the act in the judgment constitutes a legitimate defense or legitimate act, as it is for the defense of the Defendant from the victim’s assault.

In light of the degree of tangible force of the Defendant and the victim’s exercise to each other based on the aforementioned evidence, the circumstances of the instant case and the circumstances before and after the instant case, the Defendant’s conduct satisfies the requirements of reasonableness, urgency, supplement, etc. of the means and methods required by the defense or legitimate act.

It is difficult to see it.

We cannot accept the above assertion.