1. The Defendant’s “Disposition Date” in the Schedule No. 1 List shall be written in the “Plaintiff” column in the same Schedule as of each date stated.

Basic facts are the owners of golf clubs, resting rooms, etc. (hereinafter referred to as “facilities of this case”) in each area (based on the size subject to imposition) indicated in the “area subject to imposition of facilities” in the same list in the attached Table 2, or the managers of the relevant rehabilitation corporation.

From around 2012 to 2015, the Defendant imposed charges for causing traffic congestion on the Plaintiffs by applying the traffic inducement coefficient (1.04) of sports facilities prescribed in attached Table 4 of the Enforcement Rule of the Urban Traffic Improvement Promotion Act.

However, on February 24, 2016, the Yongsan-si notified the Defendant of the request for disposition that “The charges for causing traffic congestion calculated by applying the traffic inducement coefficient (4.8) of the driving range to the instant facilities according to the result of the Gyeonggi-do comprehensive audit on consulting.”

The defendant's "date of disposition" in the attached list 1 is the amount calculated by applying the traffic-causing coefficient (4.8) of the same list to the plaintiffs listed on the same date as the "date of disposition" in the same list as the "date stated in the attached list, which is the amount calculated by applying the traffic-causing coefficient (4.8) to the facilities in this case, and the notified amount of each disposition made on October 8, 2016 is the amount calculated by applying the traffic-causing coefficient 4.80, and the amount of each disposition made on January 12, 2017 and June 6, 2017 is the amount calculated by applying the traffic-causing coefficient 4.80, which is the amount calculated by applying the traffic-causing coefficient (the amount calculated by applying the traffic-causing coefficient 1.04) that is previously paid by the plaintiffs.

The imposition of charges for causing traffic congestion in this case (hereinafter referred to as "each disposition in this case").

AB made it.

On October 8, 2016, the administrative appeals decision date of the original disposition, the Hanwon-co clubs Co., Ltd., Hanwon-Co., Ltd., Hanwon-Co., Ltd., Ilbi Leisure Co., Ltd., Bluuwon Co., Ltd., Kosan Development Co., Ltd., Dosan-ri Co., Ltd., Dosan Real Estate Trust Co., Ltd., Hanhwa Real Estate Trust Co., Ltd., Han