1. All appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for cases of dismissal or addition as set forth in the following two, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

2. The old land cadastre drawn up around September 1, 197, - No. 3 pages - the former land cadastre drawn up around September 1, 197, shall be changed to “the former land cadastre drawn up before the amendment of the Cadastral Act by Act No. 2801 of December 31, 1975 (hereinafter referred to as “former land cadastre”) that was restored in the 1960s after the cadastral record was destroyed due to the influence of disturbance, etc. on the above land.”

- Of course 3, 7, and 6 pages 19, each "the old land cadastre drawn up around October 22, 197" has been written with "the old land cadastre restored around 1964".

- - 1 per one parallel to four parallels;

1-4.

The main part of this paragraph shall be filled by the following:

C. In the land research division for Qu-gun, which was prepared during the Japanese occupation period, R at the time of 1913 (2 years in 1913), the land research division for Qu-gun, which was located in the Japanese occupation period, was "S land before the division in this case."

record as a title holder of assessment.

Although the old land cadastre on the instant land before the subdivision stated the address in Seoul Special Metropolitan City as the owner, the unregistered owner was not restored.

The instant land and the instant N land were each land indicated in the list 1 and 2 of the attached real estate lists through the registration of change of the name of administrative district, conversion of the area, etc., and the instant land was divided into T on December 29, 1961 and U 321 square meters prior to T on December 29, 1961. The instant land was divided into 81 square meters prior to T on December 29, 1961, and 81 square meters prior to T on October 2, 1979, which was divided into 268 square meters prior to T on October 2, 1979, and was the land listed in the attached list 3 following change of the administrative district.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and all appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.