logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2018.04.06 2016가합10594
보험에 관한 소송
Text

1. It is confirmed that an insurance contract entered into between the Plaintiff and the Defendant is void.

2. The Defendant shall have against the Plaintiff 20,250.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On August 21, 2009, the Defendant concluded an insurance contract under Paragraph (1) of the main text that received hospitalization allowances, etc. from the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”) where the Plaintiff, the Defendant, the contractor and the insured, and the insured receive hospitalized treatment due to illness, etc.

B. From January 14, 2010 to January 27, 2010, the Defendant received hospitalized treatment at B Hospital due to catitis, etc. for 14 days, as indicated in the attached Table 2 from that time to November 30, 2015, and received from the Plaintiff KRW 20,250,000 as insurance money under the instant insurance contract.

C. Meanwhile, the insurance contracts that the Defendant concluded with the insurance company including the Plaintiff as the contractor before or after the conclusion of the instant insurance contract, and the insurance premiums, hospitalization allowances, and insurance proceeds paid accordingly are as listed in the following table:

1. Table 1: the defendant's insurance contract 2. 0. 8 0. 4 0. 5 0. 20, 00 20,00 20,300 22,300,850 20. 07 0. 8 0. 0,000 6. 20,000 6. 20,000 20,000 20,00 6. 30,00 6. 8,00 6. 20,00 6. 0,00 6. 0,00 6. 8,00 6. 20,00 6. 0,00 6. 8,00 6. 20,00 6. 40,00 29,00 20,00 20,300, 301, 207

arrow