Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

On August 24, 2009, when the defendant tried to catch earth and sand in the dry field located in the field located in D located in the same Ri, which is owned by the defendant in the above farming road, the defendant suffered bodily injury on the part of the victim E (n, 53 years old) just because the victim E flows into his dry field located under his/her bottom because it could not interfere with the situation where he/she flows into the dry field, thereby making the part of the victim's left part of the elbbbbbow with the right part of the victim's back part of the back part of the kbbbbow, which requires approximately three weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. On August 2009, the Defendant: (a) destroyed crops, such as sublime tree 2, mulberry tree 1, mulberry tree 1, quantity, and market price microfa, spatha, spatha, spatha, spatha, spatha, spatha, spatha, etc. in the market value owned by the victim, which were planted in the dry field of the victim E located in Chuncheon-si, Chuncheon-si; and (b) destroyed them by digging out the undeveloped gates by using spatha and dump trucks, etc.

2. Determination

A. Although the Defendant’s defense counsel used sckes to conduct flatization operations at the beginning of the farm road located far away from the site of this case, the Defendant did not commit the instant crime. However, as the victim’s land was lost due to the horse around August 2009, there was a change to the effect that the victim’s agricultural products, etc. could have been damaged during the foregoing process, since neighboring employees on the site of an expressway passed through the farm road adjacent to the site of this case using sckes and dump trucks, etc. for the restoration of the victim’s land.

B. (1) Determination is based on the evidence of the above charged facts to the victim, F's respective legal and investigative agencies.