logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.03.17 2017고단579
야간건조물침입절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 27, 2017, around 02:00, the Defendant: (a) went into the “E” office of the victim D’s operation in the Southern Ma-gun; (b) by intrusion into the victim’s office via the back door opened in excess of the fence; and (c) stolen and stolen the victim’s market value in an amount equivalent to KRW 1.5 million at the market price on the book, which was located in the door, in an amount of KRW 1.5 million; (d) 12 toy of an amount of KRW 30,000 at the market price on the book; (e) 12 toy of an amount of KRW 30,000,000 at the market price on the back of the door; and (e) 30,000,000 won at the market price on the back of the line.

2. From February 2, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 00:49 on February 2, 2017, when the victim G was located in the Southern-gun F of the Republic of Korea; (b) when the victim intrudes into the house through a gate opened by using the cresh of house for the her husband’s sick care in a convalescent; (c) KRW 3.2 million in cash owned by the victim; and (d) KRW 18.75 g (5 g (5 g) of the market value of which is 100,000,000,000 won in a window and KRW 1.875 g (0.5 m) of the market value of which is 10,000,000,000 won in a window, 100 marries and 3.140,000,000 won in the market value of the mar; and (d)

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement of each police statement made by the victims;

1. Each protocol of seizure and each list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (the addition of damaged articles), each investigation report (the confirmation of addition of damaged articles, specific suspect, specific search site and photograph of urgent seizure site, and confirmation of victims' counterpart seized articles);

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The Defendant agreed with the victims on the grounds of sentencing in the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes.

However, the scale of theft.

arrow