logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2016.12.02 2014가단77240
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The Defendant completed the acquisition by prescription on January 1, 1992 with respect to the Plaintiff’s share of 396/493 of the 146m2, among the 146m2.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On February 22, 1952, the deceased D (the death of November 24, 1973) sold to the Plaintiff’s father E (the father’s death of January 4, 1979) for the purchase price of KRW 300,000, the “50,000, 190, 200, 300, 200, 300, 300, 300, 300, 300.

(hereinafter “instant sales contract”). B.

Then, on November 5, 1956, “The 50 square meters under Jinduk-gu” was divided into 146 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”). The Silver donated the instant land to the Plaintiff, who married on April 28, 1961, at the 2,192 square meters, a rice shed was dried in the city of dominium in the instant land and its adjacent thereto, and the Plaintiff cultivated rice and vegetables from that time on the instant land.

C. On the other hand, with respect to the land in this case, the Gwangju District Court's Ycheon Branch's Ycheon Branch's 330 on July 27, 1957, which was received as of December 31, 1954, and the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of the network D on the ground of the completion of the repayment as of December 31, 1954, and 396/493 shares in the name of the defendant as of July 23, 1971, which was received as of July 24, 1971 as of July 24, 197, by the deceased's heir as the co-defendant, for the remaining share of 97/493 of the land in this case as of January 1, 1992, the decision of recommending reconciliation accepting the plaintiff's request was finalized.

The registration of transfer of ownership has been completed.

[Ground of recognition] Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7, 13 (including paper numbers), Eul evidence Nos. 1, witness H's testimony, appraiser I's appraisal result, the appraiser I of this court and the Bank of Korea's fact inquiry result, the plaintiff's personal inquiry result, the whole purport of the arguments

2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff purchased the land of this case from the deceased E in accordance with the contract of this case.

arrow