logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.01.13 2016고단4542
사기
Text

Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that Defendant A is a person who engages in bond-backed business against the employees of the entertainment establishments in Gangnam-gu Seoul, and Defendant B is an employee of the entertainment establishments.

Defendant

On December 15, 2014, A agreed to borrow KRW 60 million around December 17, 2014 by approaching the victim I while knowing that the victim I was holding idle funds equivalent to KRW 400 million in his/her own capital in his/her own capital in his/her own capital in his/her own loan and to increase the interest of the victim's capital in his/her own capital in his/her own capital in his/her own loan. In this process, the Defendant A agreed to borrow money from the victim I by using the fact that the victim would have to borrow money from the victim's own reliance on his/her own reliance and to borrow money from the victim, and by using the phone call to the Defendant B on December 15, 2014, he/she acquired the money from the victim, thereby obtaining the consent of the victim B.

On December 17, 2014, the defendant A calls the victim to lend the victim the amount of KRW 30,000,000 to the victim.

B It means that Defendant B shall be held liable for the full payment of money. Defendant B shall also be held liable for the full payment of money. Defendant B shall be called as “a loan of KRW 30 million to the victim’s bank account at the wife of the victim located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, on December 18, 2014, with the consent of the injured party, and the fact at the coffee shop near the home of the victim located in the Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, without the intent or ability to repay the borrowed money, shall be called as “a loan of KRW 30 million to the victim because he would have repaid the interest of KRW 5 million after three months.” On the same day, Defendant B shall receive from the injured party the remittance of KRW 30 million from the Korean bank account at the wife of Defendant B to the Korean bank account at the wife of Defendant B.

2. The judgment of this Court.

arrow