1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, fifty thousand won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving CK5 cars.

On April 14, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 04:57, and got the above vehicle back to the right side of the construction site at approximately 100 meters away from the Association of the main road in the new metropolitan area in Seoul, at about 100 meters in the south-do, at a speed of about 70km in the direction of south-do in the direction of south-do in Seoul, while driving the two lanes at the speed of about 70km in the direction of south-do in the direction of the new metropolitan area, the Defendant continued to drive the vehicle at the direction of the new metropolitan area at a speed of about the speed of about 70km, and turned the vehicle back to the right side of the construction site in order to avoid drilling.

In such cases, the Defendant, who is the driver of the above vehicle, must report the situation of measures, etc. to the police station, but the Defendant left the above vehicle on one lane on the main road of North Korean main road and did not take measures necessary to prevent danger and ensure smooth communication on the road, and left the site without reporting to the police station, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the police officers of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to survey reports on actual conditions, investigation reports, internal investigation reports (D telephone conversations), investigation reports (suspect statements) and investigation reports;

1. Relevant Article 154 of the Act and Articles 154 subparagraph 4 and 54 (2) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that at the time of the crime of this case, only a motor vehicle that the defendant driven was destroyed by the defendant, and that the passenger reported the accident to 119 and took measures necessary to ensure the prevention of danger and smooth communication on the road, so they did not have a duty to report the matters set forth in the subparagraphs of Article 54(2) of the Road Traffic Act to the police authorities pursuant to Article 54(2).

2. Determination.