logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.06.16 2017구단56431
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. All plaintiffs' lawsuits are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Reasons for recognition of refugee status by the Plaintiffs (hereinafter “each disposition of this case”) on the date of application for recognition of refugee status by the Plaintiffs: (a) details of the application for refugee status by the Plaintiffs on December 23, 2015; (b) details of the written application for recognition of refugee status by the decision of January 7, 2016; and (c) details of the written application for recognition of refugee status by the decision of January 7, 2016; (d) facts that there is no ground for recognition of rejection by the decision of the decision of October 27, 2016; (e) facts that there is no ground for recognition of rejection by the decision of the decision of October 27, 2016; (e) the written application of evidence Nos. 1 and 2;

2. Whether the instant lawsuit is lawful or not, ex officio. According to Article 20(1) of the Administrative Litigation Act, a revocation lawsuit is instituted within 90 days from the date on which the disposition is known, and in a case where a request for administrative appeal is possible, the aforementioned period shall begin from the date on which the original copy of the written adjudication is served. According to the respective descriptions of evidence Nos. 1, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 3, the Plaintiff’s mother filed an objection constituting an administrative appeal as an objection to each of the instant dispositions. The Plaintiffs’ mother, upon objection to each of the instant dispositions, filed an administrative appeal. The Plaintiffs’ objection notice of the decision on rejection of the objection (Evidence No. 2-1, 2, 3, 4) was received on December 19, 2016. The Plaintiffs’ mother, upon expiration of 90 days from the date on which the Plaintiff’s filing of the lawsuit was filed on March 24, 2017, asserting that the Plaintiff’s mother did not know that the period for filing of the lawsuit was unlawful.

Therefore, the notification of the decision of rejection is written in Korean and English, and the mother of the plaintiffs does not use the Korean or English language in the mother language.

However, the mother of the plaintiffs is the filing period.

arrow