logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.08.16 2017구합50652
부당해고구제재심판정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation.

Reasons

1. Details of the decision on retrial;

A. The Plaintiff’s relationship 1) The Plaintiff is a D Association established on December 29, 1971 (hereinafter “D Association”).

(2) The Intervenor B joined the Plaintiff on May 1, 1986 and served as a regular manager (class 3) from April 3, 2015 to the Plaintiff F (hereinafter “F”), and the Intervenor C was employed as a part-time assistant to the Plaintiff on April 1, 2004, and was employed on May 5, 2013, after employed on May 1, 2013.

B. On April 29, 2016, the Plaintiff, upon dismissal of the Intervenor, instructed the Intervenor to submit a vindication of his/her opinion regarding the following responsible matters, and issued a notice of his/her attendance at the personnel committee on May 2, 2016.

1. Matters concerning the intervenor B's responsibility;

A. The instant FF’s liability for an improper accident - The point of the instant FF - In order to sell tin gift sets to G (hereinafter “G”) on September 26, 2013 and to increase the performance, the sales proceeds of 11,424,00 won with the personal card instead of 11,424,000 won are settled on an individual card, but the remainder is recovered from October 2013 to 37,706,000 won due to the business depression of the pertinent company, etc., and the Plaintiff was aware of the fact that the remainder is not repaid, 3,000 won, 8,900,000 won in excess of 30,000 won in total, 10,000 won in cash from 3,50,000 won in the name of H organization president - 10,000 won in total and 10,000 won in the name of 3,500,000 won in the account after purchase -10.

arrow